| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
referral |
discrimination |
|
Summary:
Charter argument alluded to. Other claimants were referred. Neither an Umpire nor a Board may exercise the discretion found in 26(1). Although the course was previously approved, the Commission has apparently changed its policy.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
presumption |
|
Summary:
There is a presumption of non-availability. It may be rebutted by evidence showing that obtaining work is the prime concern and the course is secondary. One must do more than declare willingness to quit course. An extensive job search is the clearest proof.
