Decision 14572A

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 14572A   Walsh  English 1988-08-29
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
reconsideration of claim  new facts  definition 

Summary:

Conflicting decisions by other Umpires do not constitute new facts under s.86. An Umpire cannot himself change his decision on the basis of conflicting decisions subsequently rendered by other Umpires.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
umpires  jurisdiction  request for review  new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission 

Summary:

Conflicting decisions by other Umpires do not constitute new facts under s.86. An Umpire cannot himself change his decision on the basis of conflicting decisions subsequently rendered by other Umpires.


Date modified: