| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
The Board examined whether the employer acted in good faith and upon reasonable grounds in dismissing claimant. An employer may do so but these grounds do not necessarily constitute misconduct. Error in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
from employer |
|
Summary:
Just as is frequently held that a first statement must be given more weight, the same should apply to the employer's second statement when he stated that claimant would have been fired anyway on the sole incident of beer sale.
