Decision 14485A
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 14485A | Denault | French | 1989-06-09 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | vacation pay | by reason of lay-off or separation |
Summary:
Since he was entitled to three weeks vacation at the time of the layoff, the insured believes that the amount of $228 should have been spread over 3 weeks instead of only one. This argument is without merit pursuant to Reg. 58(13)b).