| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
Claimant should have been given a reasonable time at lower rate. It also seems she should have been warned that her wage expectation was too high.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
error by board |
|
Summary:
By finding that claimant was primarily interested in pursuing her own business and therefore restricting her availability, the Board did not limit itself to the issue, namely whether claimant's wage expectation limited her availability.
