| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
reason for existence of boards |
|
Summary:
Whether a claimant is available is a question of fact. Because members of Boards are not legal experts but are people drawn from the community, they are in a better position than the Umpire to make this sort of determination.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
Some question as to whether claimant had been given proper warning by Commission of the inadequacy of her job search. If she had not, that would not change her availability but might indicate hers was an appropriate case for write off of overpayment under reg. 60.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
Summary:
Writing off the overpayment or arranging for lenient pay-back terms is a matter completely within the discretion of the Commission and cannot be ordered by the Umpire.
