| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
legislation |
questions to examine |
|
Summary:
The Board looked only to the voluntary leaving and failed to address the question of just cause. That failure constituted an error in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
defined |
|
Summary:
Essential to natural justice is the right of a party to a fair hearing which, in turn, includes the right to receive notice of time and place. By appealing to Umpire instead of rehearing by Board, claimant has in no way waived his right to a fair hearing.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
new employment |
not definite |
|
Summary:
Claimant left because he had been offered a better paying job with another employer, and in anticipation that he would be called almost immediately. Attended an orientation interview and placed on standby list. Credible evidence of justification for leaving.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
decision incomplete |
various |
Summary:
The Board looked only to the voluntary leaving and failed to address the question of just cause. That failure constituted an error in law.
