Decision 14219
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 14219 | Jerome | English | 1987-10-09 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | absences from home | on vacation |
Summary:
It is not disputed that claimant was absent on vacation from 6-6 to 13-6. He could not therefore qualify for benefits for that period.