| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
premises |
|
Summary:
Question of premises not raised. Construction worker employed at a struck plant. The claimant was properly considered to have lost his employment because of the work stoppage at the mine. [p. 7]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
At issue is claimant's participation in the labour dispute. I doubt that I would have reached the same conclusion as the Board, and it appears that other Boards came to different conclusions in relation to the same situation. Unable to say that the Board's finding was perverse. [p.7]
