| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
observations from the Commission |
|
|
Summary:
No attempt made to present a balanced or objective or even accurate view of the jurisprudence to Boards. Vast quagmire of injustice operating at Board's level. Boards are too dependent on the advice by the Commission. [p._12-13]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
participation |
picket lines |
|
Summary:
There is a presumption that when one voluntarily honours a picket line, he or she is participating. Presumption rebutted if refusal to cross is due to a threat of violence or if there would be no work in any event. VALOIS and CARROZZELLA referred to.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
free of bias |
|
Summary:
Commission's representative continually interrupted and asked questions as though she were a Board member. Hearing terminated as a result of her direction. This is entirely improper and a breach of natural justice. [p. 14]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
tape-recording |
|
Summary:
The Commission should adopt the practice of recording proceedings before the Boards. Written transcripts not necessary but some sort of typed or video-taped record could be made.
