Decision 13650
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 13650 | Reed | English | 1987-05-13 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | loss of employment | casual employees |
Summary:
He worked for 2 companies on a casual basis strictly on a day to day basis. What he lost is not employment but the possibility of being offered employment. There was no employment which extended beyond the completion of the immediate shift. One cannot lose what one does not have.