| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
weight of medical evidence |
|
|
Summary:
I cannot see how the cursory examination by the independent medical examiner, and his conclusion, can stand against the much better informed determination of the claimant's doctor. [p. 6]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
yardsticks |
|
|
Summary:
CUB 6279 quoted. Here the CEIC doctor uses exactly the same terminology namely, "Although statistics cannot be applied to an individual, CEIC on average pays 7 weeks for this illness." This is irrelevant to the case and should not have been used as partof the appeal. [p. 8-9]
