| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
insurability |
jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
The only issue here appeared to be that of insurable employment, one which is exclusively a matter for the Minister of National Revenue. The Board had no jurisdiction to deal with the matter nor did I.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
authority to review |
new facts vs reconsideration |
|
Summary:
Employment ruled non insurable 1 1/2 years later. Claimant contended that the Commission should be estopped from recovering the overpayment. Whatever the merit of that argument may be, it is not one that an Umpire can address. The liability arises by law under s.36, not by a decision.
