Decision 12905
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12905 | Denault | French | 1986-12-01 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | errors in law | decision incomplete | principal means of livelihood |
Summary:
Board did not consider Reg. 43(2). This omission is undeniably an error of law. Nonetheless, apepars that insured devoted too much time and energy not to want to make it his principal means of livelihood.