Decision 12899
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12899 | Reed | English | 1986-11-28 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | allocation | applicability |
Summary:
Claimant argues, and rightly so, that reg. 58 is an allocation section. If the payments are not earnings under reg. 57(3)(h), then reg. 58(14) never comes into play.