Decision 12846
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12846 | Joyal | English | 1986-11-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| penalties | proof | need for an explanation |
Summary:
CUB 12220 referred to and explained. Proof not all on Commission. What I believe is required of a claimant whose statements are found to be false is a reasonable explanation. To impose a greater onus on him would be onerous. To impose any more on the Commission would defeat s.33.