| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
courses of study |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant wrote no to question 3 on 6 consecutive reporting cards. Her explanation that she failed to report course because told by a friend it would otherwise cause of lot of paperwork not good enough.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
duration of disqualification |
|
Summary:
The maximum disqualification is 6 weeks but, since the claimant quit her job only 2 weeks before it was due to expire in any event, a 2-week disqualification is perfectly reasonable.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
meaning |
Summary:
It is not enough that the Board may have based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact. It can do that, according to the law, with impunity. To be set aside, the finding must be one made in a perverse or capricious manner.
