| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Voluntary leaving at issue, not interrupton of earnings. Claimant was transferred to U.S.A. The Company for which he worked, in Minnesota, was at least an affiliate of the London Company, if not technically the same employer. Both were owned by the sameprincipals.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
transfer |
|
Summary:
Transferred to U.S.A. Decided to return after several months. Some question as to whether re-employed by the Canadian Company afterwards. It is clear that for the Company he was an employee of the organization, whether in Canada or USA. Just cause not shown.
From London to Mississauga. Quit due to long drive and unwillingness to relocate family. There were short term alternatives such as commuting only on weekends until other work found. He did act precipitously.
