Decision 12729
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12729 | Teitelbaum | English | 1986-10-22 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | statement of facts | as a requirement |
Summary:
Not a single reason given to allow claimant to understand why decision upheld, which is very important for claimants. If reasons were given, there would probably be many less appeals to the Umpire.