Decision 12718
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12718 | Teitelbaum | English | 1986-10-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | statement of facts | as a requirement |
Summary:
Insufficient to simply state that the Board is not convinced without giving some relevant reasons. Claimant is entitled to know why reasons given are not good cause for delay. Justice not only to be done but be perceived to have been done.