| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
retirement allowances |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant has total control over the $60084 to use it as he sees fit. If it was the intention of the employer or the true nature of the payment that it be used for pension purposes only, that kind of restriction would have been built in to the "retirement package". [p. 6]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
income |
nature of monies |
|
Summary:
Adds after quoting CUB 5810: "Although the wording used by individuals involved cannot be binding, they do serve as some indication of the intention, and therefore the true nature of the payments." [p. 5]
