| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
absences from home |
out of canada |
|
Summary:
Would have gone to B.C. instead of Arizona if he had been told that his eligibility would be affected. Overpayment: $3000. As he did not fit within reg. 54, he was not entitled to benefits.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Summary:
Even if the Commission had misinformed him (regarding his absence from Canada), the result would be the same, as the Commission is not able to modify the law and the interpretations it makes do not have the force of law.
