| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
reasonable period of time |
|
|
Summary:
Not defined in Act, but in practice may be on order of a few weeks perhaps running to several weeks after loss of employment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
leave requested |
|
Summary:
Leave to complete studies and look for something else. I am of the opinion that in such a situation the UI fund becomes a sort of bursary, which has been consistently condemned in the case law; cannot be used to finance temporary leave.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
type of work |
|
Summary:
Seeking employment for which one is not qualified amounts to imposing unreasonably restrictive conditions.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
Tribunal composed of Umpire not appellate court in traditional sense; rather, court supervising decisions of board. Umpire must not substitute his opinion for that of board.
