| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
It is a well established principle that the misconduct must be proven by the persons alleging it and, where a reasonable doubt exists, the issue should be resolved in favour of the claimant. The onus rests on the Commission to establish positively the alleged misconduct. [p. 4]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
personality conflict |
|
|
Summary:
The Board recognized the possibility of a personality conflict between the claimant and employer, a situation which has been consistently distinguished from misconduct. Personality conflicts do not constitute misconduct. [p. 5]
