| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
change of course |
|
|
Summary:
Referred to computer course starting 6-9-83 due to finish 10-8-84. Due to failing grades, principal counselled her in 1-84 to change to a secretarial course which she did. Has to prove her availability from then on as not referred. Retroactive ruling.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
presumption |
|
Summary:
Attendance at a full-time course when claimant not referred to it raises a strong presumption of non-availability and the onus is on claimant to rebut this. The Act does not provide for an automatic disentitlement but a claimant must be available for work.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
disentitlement not automatic |
|
Summary:
Attendance at a full-time course when claimant not referred to it raises a strong presumption of non-availability and the onus is on claimant to rebut this. The Act does not provide for an automatic disentitlement but a claimant must be available for work.
