Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
preparatory activities in commencing business |
|
|
Summary:
Period preceding opening cannot be considered same as operation of business; business not being operated until when it supplies services to target public; availability is what must be examined.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
availability for work |
|
|
Summary:
Held that insured did not operate business from April 22 to May 16 and was therefore unemployed; however, declared him unavailable even though this period not subject of similar decision by CEIC.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
various activities |
setting up a business |
|
Summary:
Building purchase, renovations and other work to be done certainly required substantial investment of time, but this does not make claimant irreparably not available; question of fact.