Decision 11679A

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 11679A   Denault  French 1987-02-17
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  courses  extent of availability required 

Summary:

Error of law to say that availability evenings and weekends is not what Act requires. While there is presumption that students not available, not sufficient to say this; must examine facts of case.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  courses  presumption 

Summary:

Error of law to say that availability evenings and weekends is not what Act requires. While there is presumption that students not available, not sufficient to say this; must examine facts of case.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  errors in law  attending classes 

Summary:

Error of law to say that availability evenings and weekends is not what Act requires. While there is presumption that students not available, not sufficient to say this; must examine facts of case.


Date modified: