| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Summary:
Holding a real estate licence is not sufficient to conclude that claimant was employed and not available, nor is the fact that he receive no pay conclusive that he was unemployed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
presumption |
|
Summary:
Taking a course not recommended by CEIC is not conclusive that claimant is not available. S.39 simply deems availability if course recommended. Enrollment in a non-recognized course raises a presumption that claimant is not available and it rests upon him to prove otherwise.
