| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
proof |
|
Summary:
Claimant writes that the Board and CEIC have failed to prove that he was unavailable. The onus, however, is on claimant to prove that he was available and not on the CEIC or the Board to prove that he was unavailable.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Summary:
The law is quite clear, that the first statement made is to be given greater weight than subsequent explanations or comment. CUB 8741 states that one must give more credence to a first declaration even not signed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
not signed |
|
Summary:
The law is quite clear, that the first statement made is to be given greater weight than subsequent explanations or comment. CUB 8741 states that one must give more credence to a first declaration even not signed.
