| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
Evidence beyond reasonable doubt inconsistent with aims of social legislation. I am rather of the view that CEIC must establish misconduct on balance of probabilities.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
obstinance |
|
|
Summary:
Exceeded responsibilities as nurse's aide after being warned. According to board, evidence of misconduct very thin except for some stubborness. Question of fact and not for me to substitute my assessment, however thin the evidence.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
hearsay |
|
Summary:
Evidence mere hearsay according to insured. See MILLS. Very clear: the deathknell has sounded for this argument.
