Decision 11266
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 11266 | Walsh | English | 1985-10-09 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | errors in law | decision incomplete | principal means of livelihood |
Summary:
It was an error of law by the Board to merely conclude that because claimant had the intention of making his business his main means of livelihood, he was unavailable, without giving consideration to whether this employment was so minor in extent.