Decision 11093
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 11093 | Strayer | English | 1985-09-11 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | errors in law | issue not recognized |
Summary:
The Board seems to have given equal importance to claimant's very limited job search. This was not in issue. The grounds stated by the Commission was that claimant was not unemployed under s.10. Availability comes under s.14. Error in law.