Decision 11005
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 11005 | Strayer | English | 1985-08-26 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | issue not recognized | jurisdiction exceeded |
Summary:
The Board upheld the disentitlement from 13-1, then the CEIC terminated it 13-3. Claimant said that termination should be 12-2. This decision is not one of the Board but one made by the CEIC after the Board's decision. The latter decision has not been appealed and I have no authority to review it.