Decision 10777
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 10777 | Dubinsky | French | 1985-07-15 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | proof |
Summary:
While burden of proof in UI cases is most often on insured, there are situations where the CEIC must clearly discharge it. I cite for example cases where there is allegation of misconduct.