Decision 10692
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 10692 | Joyal | French | 1985-06-26 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | proof |
Summary:
Evidence of misconduct required is not evidence beyond reasonable doubt [context: fraud]. Balance of probabilities applies in this instance and this is not a situation where benefit of doubt is given to insured.