| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
prior to stoppage |
|
Summary:
Insured left on the day of the lock-out; board believed him and Umpire of opinion he should not intervene. Up to insured to show that s. 44 not applicable. 2 ways of doing this: leaving voluntarily or relying on 44(2).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
assess credibility |
duty |
Summary:
Decision may seem questionable based on record. Credibility assessed at hearing; board believed insured. Responsiblity of board to do this. It is like jury and trier of fact. Judge may not substitute self for jury.
