| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
prior to stoppage |
|
Summary:
I found claimant left on 27-8 because of the imminence of the strike 2-9. He thought he would escape 31(1). There is an abundance of jurisprudence which holds that leaving prior to strike is a loss under s. 31.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
participation |
picket lines |
|
Summary:
The most common form of participation is respecting picket lines. Not enough for claimant to speak for himself alone. He must prove grade or class held same bona fide fear. Only those persons themselves can testify as to their individual states of mind.
