| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
good cause |
|
|
Summary:
The Board erred in law in neglecting the plain meaning of "good cause" and substituting instead a qualified meaning developed by jurisprudence which seemingly equates good cause with whether one acted prudently, this being contrary to intentions of Parliament as expressed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
course of training |
|
|
Summary:
Part-time worker laid off 2-11 and agreed that the employer would pay the cost of a course to begin 1-1 after which she would be hired back. Refused full-time job on 8-11 because unfair to prospective employer to accept work for several months only to leave for scheduled course.
