| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
ordinarily resident defined |
vs. work area |
|
Summary:
Clearly, the Board erred in law in finding that the location of claimant's employment determines the regional rate of unemployment applicable. The specific language of reg. 52 requires that the determining factor is the region in which he is ordinarily resident.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
ordinarily resident defined |
boundaries |
|
Summary:
It is not clear whether the Board considered the possible application of reg. 52(2). If the residence is close enough as to cause confusion as to which district it is in, then the Board may allow the appeal. If no such confusion exists, the Commission'sdecision must be upheld.
