Summary of Issue


Decision A-0371.93 Full Text of Decision A-0371.93

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate qualifying conditions a requirement
Summary:

Subsection10(4) if the EIA makes it clear that the possibility of antedating a claim is dependent on two conditions precedent. First, claimant must show that he or she is qualified to receive the benefit on a date earlier. Second, claimant must show that there was good cause for the delay.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate applicability implicit request
board of referees issue not recognized jurisdiction exceeded
umpires jurisdiction question not at issue

Decision A-0978.88 Full Text of Decision A-0978.88

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate qualifying conditions a requirement
Summary:

The distinction established under the antedating procedure between those who were and those who were not qualified to benefit on the prior day, creates 2 separate groups who are not equal. On this basis, there can be no breach of s.15 of the Charter.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate charter
antedate qualifying conditions interruption of earnings
board of referees rules of construction intent and object
board of referees jurisdiction priority of law

Decision 12762 Full Text of Decision 12762

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate qualifying conditions a requirement
Summary:

2 essential conditions: claimant must have been qualified on the prior day and good cause for delay must be shown to exist throughout the whole period. The onus of proving that both of these conditions have been met rests with claimant.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate proof
antedate rationale
antedate expecting compensation payments
antedate waiting for record of employment
Date modified: