Summary of Issue


Decision 55320 Full Text of Decision 55320

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested in the future
Summary:

The BOR erred in only taking into consideration the position the claimant was working in at the time of the work stoppage, i.e. in a non-bargaining unit. It could not ignore the facts that he was a due-paying member of the bargaining unit, that he was therefore participating in as well as financing the labour dispute through his dues and, most importantly, the fact that he was directly interested in the outcome and did in fact ripe some benefits, including some benefits on retirement.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute financing
labour dispute participation definition

Decision 52514 Full Text of Decision 52514

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested in the future
Summary:

The claimant had to pay union dues, even while on probation. He did not receive strike pay from his union. He was directly interested in the results of the bargaining since he obtained permanent status and received monetary and other benefits included in the new collective agreement. Failed to prove that he was not participating in, financing or directly interested in the labour dispute.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested temporary, probationary
labour dispute financing

Decision 51828 Full Text of Decision 51828

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested in the future
Summary:

Claimant lost his job because of a labour dispute at his place of work. He is not unionized, but belongs to the bargaining unit. He has had to pay union dues since he started, but is not protected until he has worked 750 hours. Considered to be at least indirectly funding the dispute as well as affected by the outcome of the strike. The precariousness of the job referred to by the claimant would not affect the actual existence of his job.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute financing

Decision 16770 Full Text of Decision 16770

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested in the future
Summary:

The direct interest exists regardless of the amount of monetary benefit. It is illogical to say that there is no direct interest because the benefits will not be implemented until after the employees return to work.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested non-bargaining group

Decision 14585 Full Text of Decision 14585

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested in the future
Summary:

The Board said that claimant, a casual worker, benefited from previous negotiations. The language of s.31 speaks of the present in referring to the labour dispute and claimant's interest is clearly envisaged as being direct rather than indirect. [p._8]

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute directly interested temporary, probationary
Date modified: