Decision 28095
Full Text of Decision 28095
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
dual status |
|
Summary:
Shareholder in a business which employs him, and which ceases operations as a result of a work stoppage by unionized employees. Held that he falls under section 31, and that he is directly interested in the dispute, as a shareholder and moreover as a negotiator during the dispute.
Decision 12974
Full Text of Decision 12974
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
dual status |
|
Summary:
Management employee and at same time shareholder of company that employed him. It appears that question of work by members of co-owners' families was subject of union demand. He was one of co-owners.
Decision 11611
Full Text of Decision 11611
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
dual status |
|
Summary:
Employed where another union had jurisdiction. Paid union dues to own union and work dues to other union. Required to join other union during lockout. There is no question he did benefit from dispute because he was called back to work.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
recall after stoppage |
|
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
strike or lockout |
|
Decision 09752
Full Text of Decision 09752
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
dual status |
|
Summary:
Shareholders ordering lock-out and therefore ceasing to work in the company as welders. Subject to same conditions as unionized welders.
