Decision 26930
Full Text of Decision 26930
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Rilar Lumber owned 51% of Cashway Centre after the sale. Claimant received a retiring allowance, continued to work without interruption, no change in duties or location. Substantial changes in salary and fringe benefits. Held that there was a separation from employment for the purpose of ss. 58(9).
Decision 16502
Full Text of Decision 16502
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Medallion and Award were really part of the same employer, namely Sutton Group insurance which covers 12 offices. It is a franchised operation, each office being incorporated separately. I am inclined to the view that each franchise is an independent employer.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
rate of benefit |
computation |
|
Decision 13433
Full Text of Decision 13433
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Claimant was a full-time employee of Dominion Stores until 7-12. He states that from 8-12 he worked for A & P. Expressions "that employer" and "that employment" emphasized. If he worked for a different employer from 8-12 onward then he has had an interruption of earnings. [p. 4]
Decision 12748
Full Text of Decision 12748
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Voluntary leaving at issue, not interrupton of earnings. Claimant was transferred to U.S.A. The Company for which he worked, in Minnesota, was at least an affiliate of the London Company, if not technically the same employer. Both were owned by the sameprincipals.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
transfer |
|
Decision A-0242.75
Full Text of Decision A-0242.75
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
new ownership |
|
Summary:
Change of corporation. While employees were doing the same things in the same business, their employer was after 1-3 the new corporation. They were not employed by the same employer within the meaning of ss.149(2).
