Decision 13620
Full Text of Decision 13620
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
2 essential conditions must be met: (a) that claimant was qualified on the prior day and (b) that good cause for delay existed throughout the whole period. The onus of proving both rests with the claimant.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
waiting for job |
searching for work |
|
Decision 13582
Full Text of Decision 13582
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
According to dissenting member, benefit of doubt should be given to insured. I am of opinion that burden of proof is on insured who alleges good cause: principle established by CUB-12839 and 13026.
Decision 12762
Full Text of Decision 12762
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
2 essential conditions: claimant must have been qualified on the prior day and good cause for delay must be shown to exist throughout the whole period. The onus of proving that both of these conditions have been met rests with claimant.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
rationale |
|
|
| antedate |
expecting compensation payments |
|
|
| antedate |
waiting for record of employment |
|
|
| antedate |
qualifying conditions |
a requirement |
|
