Decision 30265
Full Text of Decision 30265
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant suspended from 27-9 to 29-12-1993. Agreement reached on 8-11; reinstatement as of 29-11-93; disentitlement terminated by the Board on 8-11; error of law. No discretion in the Act to reduce the disqualification if the disagreement with the employer is settled.
Decision 16003
Full Text of Decision 16003
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's misconduct was serious enough but not so bad as the worst imaginable for which the maximum disqualification is reserved, for that is the case for which Parliament legislates maxima. Reduced to 4 weeks.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dereliction of duty |
|
|
Decision 15035
Full Text of Decision 15035
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's minor misconduct does not deserve maximum 6 weeks. He was not insolently insubordinate, nor did he steal, nor improperly use premises, nor did he insult clientele. Entirely innocent of any serious misconduct when compared to gross misconduct.Reduced to 1 week.
Decision 13311
Full Text of Decision 13311
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Before reducing disqualification, must ask whether disqualification itself is justified.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
personality conflict |
|
|
Decision 12906
Full Text of Decision 12906
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Maximum penalty justified only if exceptional circumstances such as striking a superior, stealing from the work place or slandering employer. Nothing in common with absenteeism.
Decision 11639
Full Text of Decision 11639
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Maximum disqualification should be reserved for most serious cases of misconduct.
