| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
vacation pay |
specific period |
|
Summary:
We are dealing with a payment received by an unemployed person. The unemployed cannot be expected to go on vacation. "In respect of" in 58(8)(a) can only mean in relation to, in reference to, connected with. The provision must necessarily refer to a past period as here.
Laid off in 12-84. Vacation pay received on anniversary date in 6-85 allocated under para. 58(8)(b). Claimant alleged that, pursuant to the labour agreement, he had already taken a number of vacation days and part of monies should be allocated to those days.
