| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
charter |
|
|
Summary:
The Court took para. 58(r) into consideration in finding that Reg. 148(1), now 37(1), is valid as a result of the amendment to para. 2(1)(n) on 11-9-77 adding the phrase "reduction in his hours of work".
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
reduction in hours |
|
Summary:
Hours of work reduced from full time to 2 hours per day; salary dropped from $125 to $25 per week. Not a reduction within the meaning of 2(1)(n), since no regulations had been made to cover this situation.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
absence of a regulation |
|
Summary:
Para. 2(1)(n) amended by adding the phrase "prescribed reduction in earnings", but no reduction prescribed by regulation. Accordingly, no effect may be given to the amendment, which is subject to regulations being made to cover this situation.
