| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| proof |
errors in law |
rules of evidence |
|
Summary:
Claimant suspended for vandalism. Only evidence in the record: a summary of an officer's telephone conversation with employer's representative. Board of Referees' decision set aside by the Umpire: the Board of Referees did not give sufficient consideration to credibility of the evidence. Error of law according to the FCA. The burden of proof was on the Commission. Evidence contradicted at the hearing and testimonies accepted as trustworthy. Umpire's findings adequately explained. Commission must bear the consequences of any shortcomings in the evidence.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| proof |
errors in law |
burden of proof |
|
Summary:
Claimant suspended for vandalism. Only evidence in the record: a summary of an officer's telephone conversation with employer's representative. Board of Referees' decision set aside by the Umpire: the Board of Referees did not give sufficient consideration to credibility of the evidence. Error of law according to the FCA. The burden of proof was on the Commission. Evidence contradicted at the hearing and testimonies accepted as trustworthy. Umpire's findings adequately explained. Commission must bear the consequences of any shortcomings in the evidence.
