| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
off-season |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant spent 50 hours a week to the affairs of a basically summertime business. My conclusion (claimant not unemployed) obviously does not prejudge the outcome of an application for benefits made by claimant once his business had become dormant at theend of the season.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0366.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
rationale |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0366.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
official wordings differ |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0366.94
