| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
layoff or separation |
definition |
|
Summary:
Claimant contended that he was not laid off but rather that he resigned. He may not have been laid off but his resignation clearly constituted a separation from employment as that term is used in reg. 58(13)(b).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
vacation pay |
by reason of lay-off or separation |
|
Summary:
Requested his vacation pay 2 weeks before termination so as to avoid a deduction from UI but he only received it after. Money actually paid in respect of separation. Otherwise, one would be able to avoid reg. 58(13)(b) simply by requesting his vacation pay a week earlier.
